Articles

Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory

Received: 15.05.2024 Published: 15.05.2024

UDC: 332 EDN: ICBHLB DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110

Full text

Abstract

Relevance . The rapid introduction of digital technologies into economic activity has marked a new paradigm of economic analysis - the analysis of economic ecosystems. The relevance of the structural study of the economic ecosystems of territories is due to both the weak elaboration of this topic in the world and domestic scientific literature, and the practical need for the formation of scientifically based strategies for the socio-economic development of territories. Goal. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for mapping the economic ecosystem of the territory. Materials and methods . The object of this study is the economic ecosystem of the territory. The subject of the study is economic relations for the development of the economic ecosystem of the territory on the basis of mapping its elements. The information base of the research was scientific publications indexed in the Scopus and RSCI databases, as well as the author's results on public management of the development of economic ecosystems. The method of logical system analysis is used as a research method. Results . As a result of the conducted research, a scheme of a map of the industry and sphere of activity of the economic ecosystem is proposed, including indicators, participants, products of activity, development trends, assessment experts and conclusions on the development of this sphere of economic activity. An algorithm for mapping the economic ecosystem of the territory has been developed, which includes the stages of segmentation, the formation of maps of industries, the assessment of development projects and the formation of a strategy for the socio-economic development of the territory. Using the example of the development of the Tyumen region, the applicability of mapping segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory for public management of the development of various fields of activity is shown. The novelty of this study lies in the development of the author's approach to mapping segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory, which develops the theory of modeling the structure and development of elements of economic ecosystems.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Попов Е.В., Челак И.П., Скворцов М.М. Картографирование сегментов экономической экосистемы территории // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2024. № 3. С. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110

For citation:

Popov E.V., Chelak I.P., Skvortsov M.M. Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024. no. 3. P. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110

How to Cite

Popov E.V., Chelak I.P., Skvortsov M.M. Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024. no. 3. P. 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110

References

  1. Moore J.F., «The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems», New York: Harper Collins, 1997.
  2. Попов Е. В., Челак И. П., Скворцов М.М. Направления экономического анализа по результатам картографирования экосистемы территории // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 22. № 11(542). С. 2078–2099. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.22
  3. Попов Е. В., Скворцов М. М. Публичное управление развитием экосистемы территории // Проблемы развития территории. 2023. Т. 27. № 3. С. 10–27. https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2023.3.125.2
  4. Z. Dobrowolski, Ł. Sułkowski, P. Adamisin. Innovative ecosystem: the role of lean management auditing // Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2022. Т. 3. P. 9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.3-01
  5. Hazell E. C. Disaggregating ecosystem benefits: An integrated environmental-deprivation index // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. № 7589. P. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187589
  6. J. Kim, B. Paek, H. Lee. Exploring innovation ecosystem of incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities: automobile firms // Sustainability. 2022. Т. 14. № 1606. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031606
  7. Jarzabkowski P., Kaplan S. Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice // Strategic Management Journal. 2015. Т. 36. № 4. P. 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2270
  8. Wright R. P., Paroutis S. E., Blettner D. P. How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools? // Journal of Management Studies. 2013. Т. 50. № 1. P. 92–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01082.x
  9. Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy // Journal of Management. 2017. Т. 43. № 1. P. 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
  10. Тебекин А. В., Тебекин П. А., Егорова А. А. Картографирование как исходный фрейм к дорожной карте познания стратегических перспектив развития // Журнал экономических исследований. 2022. Т. 8. № 3. С. 3–16. EDN MKTKMX. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49275612
  11. M. Talmar, B. Walrave, K.S. Podoynitsyna, J. Holmström, A. Georges, L.Romme. Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model // Long Range Planning. 2020. Т. 53. № 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
  12. Manyazewal T., Ali M.K., Kebede T., et al. Mapping digital health ecosystems in Africa in the context of endemic infectious and non-communicable diseases, npj Digit. Med., т. 6, № 97, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00839-2
  13. Chelak I., Popov E., Skvortsov M. Ecosystems of smart territories: cartographic and economic analysis tools, E3S Web of Conferences, т. 474, № 03002, pp. 1-8, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447403002