Articles

The US digital hegemony: characteristics, objectives and implications

Received: 15.03.2024 Published: 15.03.2024

UDC: 327 EDN: LIMZKL DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-2-297-301

Full text

Abstract

The article analyses the characteristics, goals and consequences of the US digital hegemony. The article argues that this hegemony has allowed the United States to maintain global leadership in innovation and to use its dominant position in cyberspace to unilaterally influence other countries. As a result of US digital hegemony, the rules of global data governance have become fragmented and issues such as cybersecurity, cross-border data flows and digital sovereignty have attracted widespread international attention. The "game" between the US and China around digital governance issues has escalated and is reflected in geopolitical and economic dimensions, influencing the shaping of global digital governance. The article argues that it is necessary to promote a more democratic and inclusive global digital order, mitigate the effects of unilateral rulemaking by the US and other countries, and promote the balanced development of the global digital economy.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Лю С., Сунь Г. Цифровая гегемония США: особенности, цели и последствия // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2024. № 2. С. 297–301. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-2-297-301

For citation:

Liu X., Sun G. The US digital hegemony: characteristics, objectives and implications // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024. no. 2. P. 297–301. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-2-297-301

How to Cite

Liu X., Sun G. The US digital hegemony: characteristics, objectives and implications // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024. no. 2. P. 297–301. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-2-297-301

References

  1. Ильин И. В., Лю Вэньгэ, Юдина Т. Н., Чжан Чи. Особенности развития цифровой экономики России и Китая: российско-китайское сотрудничество в контексте глобальной цифровой экономики // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 27. Глобалистика и геополитика. 2023. № 4. С. 5–22.
  2. GaoH. Digital or trade? The contrasting approaches of China and US to digital trade // Journal Of International Economic Law. 2018. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 297–321.
  3. Чжунмэй Ван. Глобальная система управления трансграничными потоками данных: разногласия и компромиссы // Международные экономические и торговые исследования. 2021. № 4. С. 98–112. (на китайском языке)
  4. Madhavan A. The ‘Digital Silk Road’ as part of China’s Belt and Road initiative: An analysis of the EU GDPR in light of its effectiveness in personal data protection. Monography. University Of Oslo, Faculty Of Law. Master Thesis, 2021.