Articles

On the issue of the "ideological vacuum" in Postmodern Russia

Received: 15.07.2023 Published: 15.07.2023

UDC: 32 EDN: MTKUXY DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-4-151-155

Full text

Abstract

Over the past decades, it has become almost a commonplace to talk about the final "end of ideology" as an objectively accomplished fact that is obvious and does not require justification. Meanwhile, real practice shows the opposite: according to most key indicators, including the rates of economic growth and development, the countries that have (China) or until recently had (the USA, the EU) a consistent ideological program are leading. In the conditions of the deepening crisis of liberal ideology, non-critically perceived by Russian society, the search for its own ideological foundations becomes a matter not as much as of the theoretical necessity than of the real practical survival and preservation of Russia as a single state and social organism.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Антименко О.О., Дружба О.В. К вопросу об "идеологическом вакууме" в России постмодерна // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2023. № 4. С. 151–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-4-151-155

For citation:

Antimenko O.O., Druzhba O.V. On the issue of the "ideological vacuum" in Postmodern Russia // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 4. P. 151–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-4-151-155

How to Cite

Antimenko O.O., Druzhba O.V. On the issue of the "ideological vacuum" in Postmodern Russia // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 4. P. 151–155. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-4-151-155

References

  1. Липсет С.М. Политический человек: социальные основания политики. М.: Мысль, 2016, 612 с.
  2. Lipset S.M., Marks G. It Didn`t Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York and London: W.W. Norton, 2000, 379 p.
  3. Shils E. The End of Ideology? Encounter, 5 (November 1955), P. 52–58.
  4. Foucault M. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984, 390 p.
  5. Шварцмантель Д. Идеология и политика. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2009, 312 с.
  6. Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек. М.: АСТ, 2015, 576 с.
  7. Бауман З. Глобализация. Последствия для человека и общества. М.: Издательство «Весь мир», 2004, 188 с.
  8. Сасскинд Д. Будущее без работы. Технология, автоматизация и стоит ли их бояться. М.: Индивидуум, 2021, 352 с.
  9. Markovits D. The Meritocracy Trap: How America`s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. New York: Penguin press, 2019. 448 p.
  10. Дин Д. Коммунизм или неофеодализм? // Логос. 2013. №1. Т.29. С. 85–116.
  11. Kotkin J. The Coming of Neo-Feudalism: a Warning of the Global Middle Class. New York: Encounter Books, 2020, 288 p.
  12. Касатонов В. Ю. Посткапитализм. От либеральной демократии к цифровому концлагерю. М.: Книжный мир, 2020. 384 с.
  13. Лежава А. Новые крепостные. Неофеодализм и современное рабство. М.: Рипол Классик, 2021. 384 с.
  14. Дугин А. Г. Теория многополярного мира. М.: Евразийское движение, 2013. 532 с.