Articles

ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE IN THE ASPECT OF GEO-ECONOMICS

Received: 15.03.2023 Published: 15.03.2023

UDC: 338 EDN: RAGBMQ DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-175-180

Full text

Abstract

The modern state, pursuing economic policy, is increasingly paying attention to objective trends in the development of the economy, economic relations in the reproductive process, including in the aspect of geo-economics. At the same time, it is based on available resources and takes into account, first of all, its own economic opportunities and national interests. Hence the relevance of the problem and attention to economic, financial and legal means and mechanisms for regulating the economy, which allow solving both domestic and foreign economic problems. Today, the role of state economic policy in geo-economics and, above all, in such strategic areas as innovative technologies, digitalization, the transition to resource-saving technologies and the country's participation in the global financial system is increasing. It should be emphasized that the state at the same time acts both as a full-fledged subject of the economy and as its regulator.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Туманян Ю.Р. ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА ГОСУДАРСТВА В АСПЕКТЕ ГЕОЭКОНОМИКИ // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2023. № 2. С. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-175-180

For citation:

Tumanyan Y.R. ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE IN THE ASPECT OF GEO-ECONOMICS // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 2. P. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-175-180

How to Cite

Tumanyan Y.R. ECONOMIC POLICY OF THE STATE IN THE ASPECT OF GEO-ECONOMICS // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 2. P. 175–180. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-175-180

References

  1. Wigell, M. Conceptualizing Regional Powers Geoeconomic Strategies: Neo-Imperialism, NeoMercantilism, Hegemony, and Liberal Institutionalism. Asia Europe Journal, 2016. 14(2), 135–151.
  2. Weber, A. Theory of industry placement. The problem of industrial standard. Munich.1926.
  3. Christaller, W. Some Considerations of Tourism Location in Europe. In: Papers, Regional Science Association. Jg. 1964.12, 95-105.
  4. Gilpin, R., 2011. Global Political Economy. Understanding the international economic order. Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
  5. Luttwak, E.N. From geopolitics to geo-economics, Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. 1990. The National Interest 20: 17–24.
  6. Szlajfer H. Economic nationalism and globalization: lessons from Latin America and Central Europe. 2012. Brill, Leiden. 143 p.
  7. Soilen, K. Geoeconomics, Bookboon, 2012, part 2, 8, 14-16.
  8. Вахрушева М.А. Новая экономическая политика – геоэкономика // Вятский медицинский вестник. 2009. № 1. С. 134-136.
  9. Hirschman, A. Национальная власть и структура внешней торговли. Berkeley: University of California Press.1945. 221 p.
  10. Лист Фридрих. Национальная система политической экономии. М.: Европа, 2005. 383 с.
  11. Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. (Перевод с англ. предисл. В. С. Афанасьева). М.: Эксмо, 2009. 960 с. (Антология экономической мысли).
  12. Ажогина Н. Н., Игнатова Т. В., Павлюкова А. В. Взаимосвязь экономического роста и доходов домохозяйств в новой социально-экономической стратегии государства // ФЭС: финансы, экономика, стратегия. 2020. Том 17. № 5. С.13-19.
  13. Тарасюк В. М. Тенденции территориального развития России. Внутренняя геоэкономика // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2008. № 5. С. 20–23.
  14. Гладкий Ю. Н., Писаренко С. В. «Геополитическая конструкция» и «геополитический потенциал» – основные понятия геополитики // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А. И. Герцена. 2013. № 154. С. 129–137.