Articles

APPLICATION OF QUANTITATIVE MODELS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BALANCE

Received: 15.01.2023 Published: 15.01.2023

UDC: 338+332 EDN: GMIEGL DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151

Full text

Abstract

The article discusses why there has been a change in the research paradigm towards quantitative methods in regional development. Factor assessment no longer met modern requirements for the development of markets and industries. However, questions remained, it was not clear to what extent the theoretical results for stylized spatial conditions would be qualitatively and quantitatively generalized to more realistic conditions in the theoretical and empirical literature on the new regional economy. Quantitative models, which are most often used in regional studies, were able to integrate three directions: spatial development, take into account the multiplicity of regional processes, and all parameters used can be identified.

Keywords

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Садыков А.И., Капустина Н.В. ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ КОЛИЧЕСТВЕННЫХ МОДЕЛЕЙ СБАЛАНСИРОВАННОСТИ РЕГИОНАЛЬНОГО РАЗВИТИЯ // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2023. № 1. С. 146–151. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151

For citation:

Sadykov A.I., Kapustina N.V. APPLICATION OF QUANTITATIVE MODELS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BALANCE // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 1. P. 146–151. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151

How to Cite

Sadykov A.I., Kapustina N.V. APPLICATION OF QUANTITATIVE MODELS OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT BALANCE // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 1. P. 146–151. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151

References

  1. Коротаев А., Васькин И., Билюга С. Гипотеза Олсона-Хантингтона о криволинейной зависимости между уровнем экономического развития и социально-политической дестабилизацией: опыт количественного анализа // Социологическое обозрение. 2017. № 16(1). С. 9-49.
  2. Блануца В. И. Проблемы развития социально-экономического районирования в эпоху «больших данных» // Региональные исследования. 2017. № 2. С. 4-11.
  3. Кособуцкая А. Ю., Трещевский Ю. И., Праченко А. А. Высокая вариативность институциональной динамики – основа нестабильности региональных экономических систем // Теоретическая экономика. 2022. May 31;89(5):86.
  4. Oomes N., Ohnsorge F. Money demand and inflation in dollarized economies: The case of Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2005 Sep 1;33(3):462-483.
  5. Debreu G. Economic theory in the mathematical mode. The American Economic Review. 1984 Jun 1;74(3):267-278.
  6. Banerjee A., Duflo E, Qian N. «On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China». Journal of Development Economics 145 (2020 г.): 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102442
  7. Седова Н. В., Придорожная Т. А. Структурный анализ капитальных вложений в системе инвестиционного планирования Российской Федерации // Финансы и кредит. 2018. Т. 24, вып. 10 (778). С. 2347–2358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2020.3.12
  8. Lucas Jr. R. Expectations and the Neutrality of Money. Journal of economic theory. 1972 Apr 1;4(2):103-124.
  9. Redding S.J. The empirics of new economic geography. Journal of regional science. 2010 Feb;50(1):297-311.
  10. Alvarez F, Lucas Jr RE. General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade. Journal of monetary Economics. 2007 Sep 1;54(6):1726-1768.
  11. Fujita M, Thisse J.F. Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and international economies. 1996 Dec 1;10(4):339-378.
  12. Eaton J, Kortum S, Kramarz F. Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations. American Economic Review. 2004 May;94(2):150-154.
  13. Allen T, Arkolakis C. The welfare effects of transportation infrastructure improvements. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2019 Jan 28.
  14. Lucas Jr RE. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society. 1978, vol. 46, issue 6, 1429-1445.