Articles

TRUST RISKS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: FRAMEWORK OF THE JOINT ANALYSIS

Received: 15.01.2023 Published: 15.01.2023

UDC: 338 EDN: IJZJUQ DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-18-26

Full text

Abstract

The article reveals the issues of the relationship between the risks of trust and industrial development, taking into account the inclusion of socio-cultural factors in the analysis of economic dynamics. The study characterizes the concept of trust and identifies the directions and areas of its impact on industrial development in the transition to the neo-industrial paradigm. The high role of the authorities and the openness of public structures in the formation of trust is substantiated. The study determined that it is advisable to use Data mining tools to assess the level of trust. It is proved that Social Mining technologies make it possible to determine the level of trust and, with subsequent conjugate analysis of the dependence of the level of neo-industrial development and the level of trust, to conduct a proactive risk analysis, identifying them at an earlier cyclical level for timely regulatory impact.

Keywords

Agencies

исследование выполнено в рамках Проекта ПСАЛ ЮФУ «Цифровой атлас политических и социально-экономических угроз и рисков развития Южнороссийского приграничья: национальный и региональный контекст («Цифровой Юг») № СП-14-22-06

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Косолапова Н.А., Никитаева А.Ю., Ласкова Д.С. РИСКИ ДОВЕРИЯ И ИНДУСТРИАЛЬНОЕ РАЗВИТИЕ: КОНТУРЫ СОПРЯЖЕННОГО АНАЛИЗА // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2023. № 1. С. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-18-26

For citation:

Kosolapova N.A., Nikitaeva A.Y., Laskova D.S. TRUST RISKS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: FRAMEWORK OF THE JOINT ANALYSIS // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 1. P. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-18-26

How to Cite

Kosolapova N.A., Nikitaeva A.Y., Laskova D.S. TRUST RISKS AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: FRAMEWORK OF THE JOINT ANALYSIS // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023. no. 1. P. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-18-26

References

  1. Burciu A., Kicsi R., Bostan I. Social Trust and Dynamics of Capitalist Economies in the Context of Clashing Managerial Factors with Risks and Severe Turbulence: A Conceptual Inquiry. Sustainability. 2020. 12. 8794.
  2. Дугин Е. Я. Власть доверия и доверие власти // Власть. 2018. Т. 26. № 8. 60-66.
  3. Knack S., Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997. 112, 1251–1288.
  4. Arrow K. Gifts and Exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, I 1972. 343-362.
  5. Kalish I., Wolf M., Holdowsky J. The link between trust and economic prosperity. Repairing the global erosion of trust has economic advantages. Deloitte insights. 2021// https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/connecting-trust-and-economic-growth.html/#endnote-sup-11
  6. Bjørnskov C., Méon P.-G. The Productivity of Trust. World Development, 2015. 70, 317-331.
  7. Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity; The Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  8. Padua D. John Maynard Keynes and the Economy of Trust the Relevance of the Keynesian Social Thought in a Global Society; Palgrave Macmillan US: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
  9. Некипелов А. Д. Что нужно для восстановления доверия к государству в социально-экономиче ской сфере / Доверие как критический фактор достижения стратегических целей социально-экономи ческого и политического развития государства. Материалы к заседанию Научно-экспертного совета При председателе Совета Федерации Федерального собрания Российской Федерации. Москва // Анали тический вестник. 2020. № 7 (750) С. 4-10.
  10. Kotler P., Caslione J.A. Chaotics: The Business of Managing and Marketing in the Age of Turbulence; AMACOM: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
  11. Drucker P.F. The Frontiers of Management; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  12. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011. 89. 62–77.
  13. Bilan Y., Brychko M., Buriak A., Vasilyeva T. Financial, business and trust cycles: The issues of synchronization. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 2019. 37. 113–138.
  14. Smith C. Trust and total factor productivity. International productivity monitor. 38. 2020.
  15. Meng Y., Wang X., Zhang G., Zheng S. Trust and corporate R&D investment: Cross-country evidence, Finance Research Letters, 2021. 40.
  16. Su K., Wu J., Lu Y. With trust we innovate: Evidence from corporate. R&D expenditure, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022. 182.
  17. Herreros F. Political evolution and institutional change. In The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust? 1st ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  18. Макушева М. О., Нестик Т. А. Социально-психологические предпосылки и эффекты доверия социальным институтам в условиях пандемии // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 6. С. 427-447.
  19. Резер Т. М. Информационная открытость органов государственного и муниципального управления. Екатеринбург: Издательство Уральского университета, 2018.