Articles

Targeting identity: the concept of weaponized narrative in the propaganda discourse of modern wars

Received: 15.07.2025 Published: 15.07.2025

UDC: 32.019.5+355.244 EDN: QXGGOM

Full text

Abstract

Introduction. The growing role of information and propaganda in contemporary armed conflicts raises the question of the specific role of narratives within it. Directly related to this is the question of to what extent does the role of narratives in war discourse influence not only their semantic content but also their structure? And how can this morphological feature of narratives used in war contexts be conceptually expressed? Purpose. To substantiate the claim that, among all the varieties of political narrative used in the analysis of modern military propaganda discourse, the concept of armed narrative appears particularly promising methodologically. Methods. As the primary research method, the author applies a structural approach to the analysis of political narratives, as well as a comparative analysis of concepts related to the discourse of military-political conflicts. Results. This article presents a critical analysis of political narrative concepts in terms of their relevance to the discursive and propaganda specifics of modern warfare. Drawing on the experience of understanding armed narratives in Western think tanks, the author describes the structural features of armed narratives, as well as their functions in military propaganda discourse. Based on the research conducted, the article demonstrates the potential of the armed narrative concept, particularly for analyzing anti-Russian propaganda discourse. Conclusions. The article substantiates that an armed narrative, always aimed at the identity of the enemy and its target audience, tends not to objectively analyze the situation, but to promote its subjective interpretation in order to displace competing narratives. The author concludes that, unlike other concepts expressing varieties of political narratives, the concept of armed narrative allows for the most accurate expression of the discursive specifics of modern military-political conflicts.

Keywords

Agencies

Публикация подготовлена в рамках реализации государственного задания ЮНЦ РАН на 2025 г., № государственной регистрации 125011200149-6. Тема: «Угрозы и риски социально-политической безопасности Южного макрорегиона в условиях военно-политической напряжённости»

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Поцелуев С. Целясь в идентичность: концепт вооруженного нарратива в пропагандистском дискурсе современных войн // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Учёные записки. 2025. № 4. С. 201–209.

For citation:

Potseluev S. Targeting identity: the concept of weaponized narrative in the propaganda discourse of modern wars // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2025. no. 4. P. 201–209.

How to Cite

Potseluev S. Targeting identity: the concept of weaponized narrative in the propaganda discourse of modern wars // State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2025. no. 4. P. 201–209.

References

  1. Соловьев А.И. Нарративы в пространстве власти. Возможности и пределы нарративных политик // Политическая наука. 2025. № 2. С. 18–40. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.02.01
  2. Помигуев И.А., Прокопчук Т.Л., Кошкин А.В. Возможности метода нарративного анализа, или Как искать политические ценности в российском кино? // Политическая наука. 2024. № 4. С. 45–65. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.04.02. EDN: QPTLIW
  3. Arquilla J., Ronfeldt D. Networks and Netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. 352 р.
  4. Nye J.S. The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective // Foreign Affairs. 2010. Vol. 89. № 6. Р. 2-12.
  5. Dobias Р. Hybrid Warfare and the Need for Intermediate Force Capabilities // Connections QJ. 2022. Vol. 21. № 2. Р. 5-9. DOI: 10.11610/Connections.21.2.00
  6. Томашевский Б. В. Теория литературы. Поэтика: Учеб. Пособие. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1996. 334 с.
  7. Женетт Ж. Фигуры. В 2–х т. Т. 2. М.: Изд-во им. Сабашниковых, 1998. 944 с.
  8. Miskimmon A., O’Loughlin B., Roselle L. Strategic narratives: Communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge, 2013. 240 р.
  9. Подшибякина Т.А. Стратегические нарративы как политический ресурс мягкой силы: “Бессмертный полк” на страже интересов России // Вестник Пермского университета. Политология. 2021. Т. 15. № 3. С. 52–59. EDN: DXONMS. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218–1067-2021-3-52-59.
  10. Лассуэлл Г.Д. Техника пропаганды в мировой войне: перевод с англ. В. Г. Николаева. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2021. 237 с.
  11. Плотникова С.Н. Дискурсивное конструирование России в современных западных СМИ // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2018. № 1. С. 50-59. EDN: YXHUDI
  12. Bergmann E. Weaponizing conspiracy theories. New York: Routledge, 2025. 123 p.
  13. Kvernbekk T., Bøe-Hansen O. Chapter 12. How to Win Wars: The Role of the War Narrative // Narration as Argument, ed. Paula Olmos. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2017. Р. 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_12
  14. Allenby B., Garreau J. Weaponized Narrative Is the New Battlespace: And the U.S. is in the unaccustomed position of being seriously behind its adversaries // Weaponized Narrative: The New Battlespace / Allenby B., Garreau J. (eds.). Washington, D.C.: Weaponized Narrative Initiative, Center on the Future of War, March 21, 2017. Р. 5–9.
  15. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations / Miskimmon A., O’Loughlin B., Roselle L. (eds.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2017. 340 p.
  16. Waldman S., Havel S. Launching Narrative into the Information Battlefield // Connections QJ. 2022. Vol. 21. № 2. Р. 111–122. DOI: 10.11610/Connections.21.2.08
  17. Bernardi D. et al. Narrative Landmines: Rumors, Islamist Extremism, and the Struggle for Strategic Influence. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2012. 220 р.